From Gold Rush to Financial Freedom

In the annals of financial history, the significance of the gold standard stands as a testament to our evolving attitudes toward money and fiscal responsibility. Since its formal adoption in 1873, the gold standard represented a bedrock of stability in the United States, anchoring the value of our currency to a tangible asset and fostering confidence in economic transactions. However, the landscape has shifted dramatically since then, with modern attitudes toward monetary policy reflecting a departure from the stringent constraints of the gold standard era.

Today, as we grapple with unprecedented economic challenges and global uncertainties, the legacy of the gold standard serves as a poignant reminder of the trade-offs between stability and flexibility in shaping our financial future.

Pre-Gold Standard Chaos: Navigating Currency Instability in 19th Century America

Before adopting the gold standard in 1873, the United States experimented with various forms of currency, leading to monetary instability and uncertainty. One such system was the bimetallic standard, where both gold and silver served as legal tender at fixed exchange rates. However, this system faced challenges due to fluctuating gold and silver prices, leading to currency devaluation and inflation. Another prevalent form of currency was paper money, issued by individual banks and the federal government. However, the proliferation of banknotes and lack of standardized regulation resulted in widespread fraud and financial instability. Amidst this chaos, policymakers sought a more reliable and stable monetary system, eventually adopting the gold standard in 1873.

The gold standard was a monetary system where a country’s currency or paper money had a value directly linked to gold. Under this system, the United States Government fixed the value of a country’s currency in terms of a specified amount of gold. Our government officially adopted the gold standard in 1873, solidifying the nation’s commitment to a stable and predictable monetary system.

Why the Gold Standard

Before the official adoption of the gold standard in 1873, the United States had experimented with various forms of currency, including paper money issued by individual banks and the federal government. However, the volatility and uncertainty of these systems led policymakers to seek a more reliable standard.

The Coinage Act of 1873, also known as the Crime of ‘73, formally established the gold standard in the United States. This legislation demonetized silver as a currency, effectively placing the country on a mono-metallic gold standard. Under this system, the value of the US dollar was defined by a fixed weight of gold, providing stability to the nation’s currency and facilitating international trade.

The Interwar Period and Abandonment of the Gold Standard

The gold standard remained in place throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, contributing to relative economic stability and growth. However, the onset of World War I and the subsequent economic turmoil of the interwar period strained the gold standard system.

During the Great Depression of the 1930s, many countries, including the United States, faced mounting economic pressures and began to abandon the gold standard in favor of more flexible monetary policies. In 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 6102, which prohibited the hoarding of gold and required individuals to exchange their gold coins, bullion, and certificates for US dollars at the prevailing rate.

The Gold Reserve Act of 1934 effectively nullified the gold standard by allowing the US Government to peg the value of gold at $35 per ounce and hold gold reserves to back the dollar. This law marked a significant departure from the strict gold standard system. It was an important moment in our financial history because it gave the government a taste of having greater control over monetary policy.

Transitioning Off the Gold Standard in 1971

Despite the modifications to the gold standard during the interwar period, the system faced challenges in the post-World War II era. The devastation wrought by the war left many countries economically weakened, leading to instability in global financial systems. Additionally, the costs of rebuilding war-torn nations and funding post-war reconstruction efforts strained the limited gold reserves held by participating countries. Moreover, the emergence of new economic powers and shifting geopolitical dynamics further complicated the functioning of the gold standard. These factors collectively contributed to mounting pressures on the gold standard system.

The Bretton Woods Agreement

In 1944, representatives from 44 Allied nations gathered in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to establish a new international monetary system known as the Bretton Woods Agreement. Under the Bretton Woods Agreement, participating countries agreed to peg their currencies to the US dollar, which remained convertible to gold at a fixed rate of $35 per ounce. The results of this agreement effectively made the US dollar the world’s primary reserve currency. They upheld the semblance of a gold standard system.

However, by the late 1960s, the United States faced mounting trade deficits and inflationary pressures, leading to doubts about the sustainability of the Bretton Woods system. In August 1971, President Richard Nixon announced the suspension of the US dollar’s convertibility into gold, effectively ending the country’s adherence to the gold standard. Those who listen to our radio show, The Gold Standard, are familiar with this part of our financial history because Ken Russo, SVP of the Midas Gold Group, is known for his uncanny impersonation of President Nixon.

The President’s decision, known as the Nixon Shock, marked the culmination of years of economic instability and signaled a new era in international finance. Without a formal gold standard, currencies began to float freely against one another, ushering in an age of fiat currency and flexible exchange rates. The US dollar is currency and not money because it’s not a reliable store of value. It hasn’t been since Nixon took us off the gold standard in 1971.


The gold standard played a crucial role in shaping the economic history of the United States, providing stability and confidence in the nation’s currency for nearly a century; however, changing economic conditions and geopolitical pressures mounted until our government decided to abandon the gold standard in favor of more flexible monetary systems. While the gold standard remains a relic of the past, its legacy continues to influence debates surrounding monetary policy and the global economy.

Today, the gold standard remains a debate among economists and policymakers, with proponents advocating for a return to its sound money principles, while others argue for the merits of fiat currencies and flexible monetary policies. Regardless of its current status, understanding the legacy of the gold standard provides valuable insights into the evolution of modern financial systems and the ongoing quest for monetary stability and prosperity.

In their book MONEY: How the Destruction of the Dollar Threatens the Global Economy—and What We Can Do About, Steve Forbes and Elizabeth Ames argue that stable money is the only way to a true and lasting recovery and a genuinely prosperous economy. Perhaps most importantly, it will restore trust in our monetary system.

The authors make a strong case for a return to the gold standard. The current fiat currency system, detached from any tangible asset like gold, is inherently unstable and prone to manipulation by governments and central banks. By returning to the gold standard, Forbes believes that we can anchor the value of our currency to a stable and universally recognized asset, thereby curbing inflation, preserving purchasing power, and promoting long-term economic prosperity. Additionally, he suggests that a gold standard would foster greater discipline in fiscal policy, limit government intervention in the economy, and provide individuals and businesses with a reliable framework for financial planning and investment. Overall, Forbes contends that embracing the gold standard is essential for safeguarding the integrity of our monetary system and ensuring a more prosperous future for all.

, , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Side Panel Text Widget

Aliquam erat volutpat. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Integer sit amet lacinia turpis. Nunc euismod lacus sit amet purus euismod placerat? Integer gravida imperdiet tincidunt. Vivamus convallis dolor ultricies tellus consequat, in tempor tortor facilisis! Etiam et enim magna.

Midas Gold Group